Two Systems, Not One
Most construction workers who are injured on the job assume that workers' compensation is their only legal option. They file the claim, they collect about two-thirds of their wages, they get their medical bills paid, and they accept that as the system. Some recover fully. Many do not — and many who do not recover fully do not know that they had access to a second, more powerful legal system all along.
New York workers' compensation and New York Labor Law personal injury claims are not alternatives. In many construction accident cases, they are parallel remedies. Filing one does not preclude the other. Understanding how they work together — and where each falls short — is essential for any construction worker who has been seriously injured.
What Workers' Compensation Provides
Workers' compensation is a no-fault system. You do not need to prove your employer was negligent. You do not need to prove anyone did anything wrong. You simply need to show that your injury arose out of and in the course of your employment.
In exchange for this low evidentiary bar, workers' compensation provides limited benefits:
Temporary total disability pays approximately two-thirds of your average weekly wage (AWW), calculated from the 52 weeks before the accident, subject to a statutory cap that changes annually. For 2024, the maximum weekly benefit is $1,145.43. A construction worker earning $2,000 per week would receive approximately $1,333 per week — $666 short of their actual loss every single week they are out.
Temporary partial disability pays a reduced benefit if you can do light-duty work but cannot return to full-duty construction.
Permanent total disability benefits continue for life if the Workers' Compensation Board determines you can no longer work.
Permanent partial disability — a "schedule loss of use" award — provides a lump sum based on the body part injured. The schedule is fixed by statute. A permanent 75% loss of use of an arm is worth a specific dollar amount set by the Board, regardless of your occupation, regardless of your age, regardless of how much that arm was worth to your construction career.
Medical treatment is covered in full, subject to fee schedules. The comp carrier approves or rejects treatment through a utilization review process. Authorization fights over surgery, physical therapy, and specialist referrals are common and often delay necessary care.
What Workers' Compensation Does Not Provide
Workers' compensation does not pay for pain and suffering. It does not compensate for the loss of enjoyment of life. It does not pay for the fear of permanent disability. It does not account for the difference between being a healthy, working construction tradesman and a permanently injured person who cannot climb a ladder or lift materials.
It does not pay the full economic loss. If you earned $100,000 per year and the comp system replaces $67,000, you absorb the difference every year until you can return to full duty — if you ever can.
It does not contemplate future economic loss beyond the statutory schedule. A 35-year-old ironworker with a career trajectory toward foreman and superintendent work, permanently disabled by a fall, might lose $4 to $6 million in lifetime earnings. Workers' comp will pay a fraction of that.
The Exclusive Remedy Rule — and Its Critical Exception
Workers' Compensation Law § 11 establishes the "exclusive remedy" rule: your employer is shielded from personal injury lawsuits if it provides workers' compensation coverage. You cannot sue your employer for negligence in connection with a workplace injury, regardless of how careless the employer was.
This rule has one critical exception for construction accidents that changes everything: it does not apply to parties other than your employer.
If you work for Subcontractor A, and you are injured because of defective scaffolding on a site owned by Property Owner B and overseen by General Contractor C — you cannot sue Subcontractor A, but you can absolutely sue Property Owner B and General Contractor C. They are third parties. The exclusive remedy rule does not protect them.
And here is where Labor Law 240 becomes essential. The statute imposes strict liability on property owners and general contractors. It gives injured workers a direct legal claim against the parties who, in most cases, have the deepest pockets and the greatest ability to pay full compensation. The exclusive remedy rule shields your employer. Labor Law 240 opens the door to everyone else.
Running Both Claims Simultaneously
New York law allows — and, as a practical matter, requires — construction accident victims to pursue both workers' compensation and personal injury claims simultaneously.
Workers' comp runs through an administrative proceeding before the Workers' Compensation Board. It begins paying benefits relatively quickly after a claim is filed and accepted. This provides income replacement and medical coverage during the often-long period while the personal injury lawsuit is pending.
The personal injury lawsuit proceeds through the court system. It takes longer — often two to four years from filing to verdict or settlement. But it recovers the full range of damages.
There is a coordination provision: the workers' compensation carrier has a lien on any personal injury recovery. If you receive $200,000 in workers' comp benefits and then settle your Labor Law claim for $1 million, the carrier is entitled to be reimbursed from the settlement — subject to complex lien reduction arguments that an experienced attorney can negotiate. You do not keep both the full comp benefits and the full personal injury recovery for the same losses. But the total recovery from both streams combined will substantially exceed what workers' comp alone would have provided.
Specific Numbers: Why the Gap Matters
Consider a concrete case. A 38-year-old union carpenter earning $85,000 per year falls from an improperly secured scaffold at a luxury apartment construction site. He sustains a fractured lumbar spine requiring fusion surgery, six months of rehabilitation, and is permanently limited to sedentary work only.
Workers' compensation provides:
Personal injury lawsuit against the property owner and general contractor:
The comp carrier's lien on that recovery would be several hundred thousand dollars. But after satisfying it, the carpenter's total recovery from both systems combined would vastly exceed what workers' comp alone could ever provide.
The LHWCA: A Different System for Some Workers
Federal workers — longshoremen, harbor workers, and certain maritime construction workers — may fall under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) rather than New York workers' comp. The LHWCA has different benefit calculations, different procedures, and different third-party claim rules. Workers on navigable waterways, in shipyards, or on harbor-related construction projects should ask their attorney specifically whether federal maritime law applies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can I collect workers' comp and also sue the general contractor?
Yes. In most construction accident cases, these are entirely compatible claims. Workers' compensation runs against your employer and is funded by your employer's insurance carrier. The personal injury lawsuit runs against the property owner and general contractor — not your employer. The exclusive remedy rule shields your employer from lawsuit but leaves all other parties fully exposed. You must disclose the workers' comp claim in your personal injury case, and the carrier will assert a lien on any recovery, but collecting both is not double recovery — it is collecting partial compensation from two different legal sources against two different sets of defendants.
Q: My workers' comp claim was disputed and I'm getting nothing right now. Does that affect my personal injury case?
No. The personal injury case proceeds independently of the workers' compensation proceeding. A disputed comp claim — even a denied comp claim — has no bearing on a Labor Law 240 or 241 claim against the property owner and general contractor. The comp dispute is between you and your employer's carrier. The personal injury case is between you and entirely different defendants who have no stake in the comp outcome. In practice, if your comp claim is disputed and you have no income, proceeding quickly on the personal injury case becomes even more financially urgent.
Q: My employer paid me cash — I'm not on the books. Do I still have rights?
Yes. Workers' compensation coverage and Labor Law rights do not depend on your employment classification or tax treatment. Workers paid off the books, workers misclassified as independent contractors, workers paid in cash — all retain their rights under New York Labor Law. If you were performing construction work at the direction of an employer on a New York construction site, you are a covered worker. Your employer's failure to follow payroll laws may actually strengthen your claim in some respects, since it reflects the same pattern of disregarding legal obligations. Consult with a construction accident lawyer regardless of how you were paid.
Q: I settled my workers' comp case. Does that mean my personal injury case is also settled?
Absolutely not. Workers' compensation settlements — called "Section 32 agreements" — resolve the comp claim only. They typically include language saying the settlement is of the workers' comp claim and does not affect any third-party personal injury claims. Read any settlement document carefully before signing, but as a general rule, settling your comp case does not release the property owner, general contractor, or any other non-employer defendant from liability. Confirm this with your personal injury attorney before signing any workers' comp settlement.
Q: My employer is pushing me to settle my workers' comp case quickly. Should I?
Be cautious. Employers and their insurance carriers are motivated to settle workers' comp cases quickly, before the full extent of permanent disability becomes clear, and before you have consulted a personal injury lawyer who may help you understand the full scope of your rights. A Section 32 agreement that settles your comp case for $150,000 may seem generous until you learn that your Labor Law 240 case against the property owner might be worth $3 million. Those two cases are independent, but the timing matters — your workers' comp attorney and your personal injury attorney should be coordinating strategy, not working at cross-purposes. Make sure both cases are being handled with awareness of the other.
Q: I was injured working for a temp agency assigned to a construction site. Who can I sue?
This is a common and important scenario. The temp agency is typically your direct employer — the exclusive remedy rule protects the agency from personal injury lawsuit. But the construction site owner and the general contractor who contracted with the agency are not your employer. They remain fully exposed to Labor Law 240 and 241 claims. Courts have consistently held that temp agency workers performing construction tasks at a third-party site are covered by the Labor Law. The fact that your paycheck came from the agency rather than the site owner does not alter the analysis. The site owner still controls the premises; the general contractor still controls the work. Their obligations run to you regardless of who cut your paycheck.
Call (888) 702-1581 for a free case review. There is no fee unless we recover.
